Deal Me In Challenge: Story #32 – “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant

Deal Me InStory #32 for the Deal Me In Challenge is brought to me by the 9 of Diamonds – “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant.  According to Wikipedia, the story first ran in the French paper Le Gaulois in February 1884 and has since inspired several other authors and playwrights.  It is widely available in the public domain, and I read it at East of the Web.

This is a story I felt like most everyone had read except me.  Once I finished reading it, I was overcome by the nagging suspicion that I had in fact 9 diamondsread it many years before, but it may be simply that the story is so iconic that echoes of it can be found in many other works.

The story is quite simple at heart – a young woman of modest means desires pretty dresses and jewelry yet has no hope of ever having them.  Her husband works hard as a clerk, and they have a home and one servant. So I would not call them poor by an means, but they certainly feel that they are poor in comparison to other families they know.

When the husband brings home an invitation to a fancy soirée, thinking his wife will be thrilled, he is surprised to find that she is instead dejected.  The practicalities of their situation decree that she has nothing suitable to wear to such an affair. Although the husband has been saving money to buy himself a gun, (for leisure, it should be noted…not for necessary hunting) he decides to give the money to his wife so she can buy a dress for the party.  For jewelry, she will borrow something from a more affluent friend, even though it will be a bit humiliating to do so.  She borrows a lovely diamond necklace and is overcome with joy.

The evening in question arrives, and a good time is had by all.  But when the couple returns home, the necklace is nowhere to be found!  After an exhaustive search, it is decreed lost.  The husband borrows money from everyone he knows, and a replacement necklace is purchased and substituted with the lender none the wiser.  The couple spends the next 10 years (!) paying back these debts, moving to a tiny attic apartment, dismissing the servant and living even more simply.  The husband takes in extra work; the wife does all the housework herself and ages rapidly.  Eventually the debts are paid and the couple’s minds are set at ease.

A chance meeting later with the lender of the necklace brings a shock and the characteristic de Maupassant twist ending, which I will not spoil for anyone who has not read the piece.

On the surface, it would seem that this story gives critique to social striving, covetousness and materialism.  But this was a natural and honest sentiment for the woman – wanting to be appropriately dressed for the occasion and not humiliated among others more fortunate.  I don’t feel this is what the author intended to critique at all.  The couple pays their debts, at great personal loss and with much hardship yet without undue complaint.  If they had just been honest with the lender instead of trying to cover up the fact that the necklace was missing, they could have spared themselves so much grief.  I feel like de Maupassant was trying to make the point that trying to cover up a negative occurrence through trickery and deception brings more suffering that it alleviates, even as it may be well-meaning.  In lying in an attempt to avoid the lender’s potential anger or disdain or grief at the loss, they took on a greatly-disproportionate quantity of pain themselves, needlessly.  Two entire lives ruined, all for a meaningless bauble.  Don’t we see such dramas play out, perhaps less dramatically, all around us every day?

 

 

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Deal Me In Challenge: Story #32 – “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant

  1. This was such a depressing story. I remember having to read this in French class — I think he’s a staple storyteller.

    Reply
  2. You have thoroughly intrigued me with your review. I have not read this, but it remind me of an O’Henry story: lots of lessons to be had over material possessions. Now I’ll have to read this.

    Reply
  3. Pingback: Deal Me In – Week 32 Wrap Up | Bibliophilopolis

  4. I love de Maupassant. I’ve not read this one yet. The thing I like about his writing is that he does get into the sentiments of characters in a very deep way. He’s usually so clear in his writing.

    Reply
  5. It reminds me of O. Henry’s “The Gift of the Magi”, although it seems more grim than that story. Great review! I haven’t read anything by de Maupassant but now I want to.

    Reply
  6. I love “The Necklace” (posted about it once before at http://bibliophilica.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/the-elegance-of-a-well-turned-twist/ if you’d like to take a look) and the character Mathilde was a “nominee” in the favortie short story female character category my first annual “The Shorties” awards last year (she was snubbed by “the voters” though 🙂 )

    I particularly like the final paragraph of your post. I also think the “deception leads to magnification of suffering” is probably where GdM was heading.

    de Maupassant wrote a lot of other great stories too, though I have only explored a handful thus far.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s